Which finding would generally exclude using IV thrombolysis in suspected ischemic stroke?

Prepare for the Internal Medicine II Test with engaging flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Each question is detailed with hints and explanations. Gear up your knowledge for success!

Multiple Choice

Which finding would generally exclude using IV thrombolysis in suspected ischemic stroke?

Explanation:
The main idea is that IV thrombolysis (tPA) is given to dissolve a clot in acute ischemic stroke, but it carries a high risk of bleeding. If imaging shows an intracranial hemorrhage, administering a clot-busting drug would worsen the bleeding inside the brain and can be life-threatening, so this finding would generally exclude IV thrombolysis. Other scenarios here do not pose the same absolute risk: a normal CT scan means there is no bleed, so treatment can proceed if other criteria are met; a blood pressure of 120/80 is within the safe range for thrombolysis; and mild symptoms that are resolving on their own are not an absolute contraindication, though they may influence the decision to treat in some cases.

The main idea is that IV thrombolysis (tPA) is given to dissolve a clot in acute ischemic stroke, but it carries a high risk of bleeding. If imaging shows an intracranial hemorrhage, administering a clot-busting drug would worsen the bleeding inside the brain and can be life-threatening, so this finding would generally exclude IV thrombolysis. Other scenarios here do not pose the same absolute risk: a normal CT scan means there is no bleed, so treatment can proceed if other criteria are met; a blood pressure of 120/80 is within the safe range for thrombolysis; and mild symptoms that are resolving on their own are not an absolute contraindication, though they may influence the decision to treat in some cases.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy